| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion |
| Date: | 2014-11-01 21:00:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobxPPj3ntXoYk+RtTfVc8HN1pW=bAdQ=KoN565FLzC=WQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I doubt it. There's a whole bunch of problems that just exist by virtue
> of having a group leader. What if the leader dies but the worker backend
> isn't in a section of code that does a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()?
In between all of the heat about whether I'm writing the correct
patch, or whether I'm overall making progress fast enough, somebody
could, I don't know, read the patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-11-01 21:06:41 | Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-11-01 20:59:34 | Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion |