| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Syntax for partitioning |
| Date: | 2011-11-09 15:15:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobu2wHerwHBiAyxb3yAWhHeAUZGEiWFXtoYsH8OVW-ERA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> So will this be revived any time soon? Were there any subsequent
>> proposals which were posted?
>>
>
> there was an updated patch, you can find in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20100114181323.9A33.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
>
> not sure what happens after that.
I reviewed a later version here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-07/msg00183.php
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-09 15:24:53 | Re: const correctness |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-09 15:12:25 | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |