Re: better atomics - v0.5

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: better atomics - v0.5
Date: 2014-06-26 00:22:31
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobr+0aak5_6kQwsYfuKGs0JhTy7VQ7tn_rNtF205YSZ2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> I think having a separate file for each architecture is nice. I totally
> agree that they don't belong in src/include/storage, though. s_lock.h has
> always been misplaced there, but we've let it be for historical reasons, but
> now that we're adding a dozen new files, it's time to move them out.

I find the current organization pretty confusing, but maybe that could
be solved by better documentation of what's supposed to go in each
architecture or compiler-dependent file.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-06-26 00:31:29 Re: Set new system identifier using pg_resetxlog
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-06-26 00:16:08 Re: better atomics - v0.5