| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Failover Slots |
| Date: | 2016-02-04 03:16:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobo3ucC+baYjGukyBMnRDXkpaQHFDO_2At_CC-6vjM-eg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I think it's technically quite possible to maintain the required
> resources on multiple nodes. The question is how would you configure on
> which nodes the resources need to be maintained? I can't come up with a
> satisfying scheme...
For this to work, I feel like the nodes need names, and a directory
that tells them how to reach each other.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2016-02-04 03:29:48 | Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-04 03:04:57 | Re: 2016-01 Commitfest |