Re: OperationalError: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OperationalError: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already
Date: 2011-08-14 04:16:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmobiDb-igYZifaZfLFX15DbpZnLSB4Xp1i8me+_3rRBr2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:19 PM, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> wrote:
> This seems to be bug month for my client. Now there are seeing periods
> where all new connections fail immediately with the error:
>
>   FATAL:  lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
>
> This happens on postgresql 8.4.7 on a large (512GB, 32 core) system that has
> been up for months. It started happening sporadicly a few days ago. It will
> do this for a period of several minutes to an hour and then go back to
> normal for hours or days.
>
> One complete failing session out of several hundred around that time:
> -----------------
> 2011-08-09 00:01:04.446  8823  [unknown]  [unknown]  LOG:  connection received: host=op05.xxx port=34067
> 2011-08-09 00:01:04.446  8823  c77  apps  LOG:  connection authorized: user=apps database=c77
> 2011-08-09 00:01:04.449  8823  c77  apps  FATAL:  lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
> ------------------
>
> What can I do to help track this down?

I've seen that error (though not that exact fact pattern) caused by
bad RAM. It's unclear to me what else could cause it.

In terms of debugging, it seems like it might be sensible to start by
injecting some debugging code that dumps out the contents of the LOCK
and LOCALLOCK structures at the point the error occurs.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message daveg 2011-08-14 05:44:44 Re: OperationalError: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-14 04:12:19 Re: vacuum scheduling (was: index-only scans)