Re: a slightly stale comment

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a slightly stale comment
Date: 2012-03-07 17:33:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmobhChd2NpWtFKOMvUCTMvyYQ6G_b82ip_z011vcHW0_2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Kevin Grittner
> <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>
>> What part of it do you find to be accurate or helpful?
>
> I think its funny and scary, as well as being of historical interest.
>
> But please suggest a new wording so we can discuss it.

I think we should just remove it. It doesn't actually say anything of
any value, and it's been wrong for 13 years. Surely that's enough
reason to just forget about it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-03-07 17:38:46 Re: a slightly stale comment
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-07 17:31:37 Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?