| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
| Date: | 2013-10-11 00:51:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob__iMRQR+z09M-qSK8PvuUtuCxx25Ucjs-9jSW=zZtng@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Patch attached.
ISTM that we have broad consensus that doing this at initdb time is
more desirable than doing it in the server on the fly. Not everyone
agrees with that (you don't, for instance) but there were many, many
votes in favor of that option.
Judging by the commit I just pushed to do initdb-time selection of the
dynamic shared memory implementation to use, this is probably not hard
to code.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-11 00:56:23 | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-11 00:44:07 | Re: CommitFest progress |