Re: Allow substitute allocators for PGresult.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allow substitute allocators for PGresult.
Date: 2011-11-12 06:36:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmobDGGXXOYWokkJm8Tj8R0zHKzbag_cysJNLCXNdRXS97A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> AIUI Kyotaro-san is just suggesting that the app should be able to
> provide a substitute malloc function for use in allocating PGresult
> space (and not, I think, anything else that libpq allocates internally).
> Basically this would allow PGresults to be cleaned up with methods other
> than calling PQclear on each one.  It wouldn't affect how you'd interact
> with one while you had it.  That seems like pretty much exactly what we
> want for preventing memory leaks in the backend; but is it going to be
> useful for other apps?

I think it will.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-11-12 07:11:45 Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-11-12 05:48:26 Re: Allow substitute allocators for PGresult.