Re: uncataloged tables are a vestigial husk

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: uncataloged tables are a vestigial husk
Date: 2012-06-13 17:17:39
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob7QG93E1FohEFBweF-cCCRuR+JD0DyQnwj2ssrY3evzA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
>> teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.
>
> I think there are probably some places to fix in the docs too.

catalogs.sgml doesn't include it in the list of possible relkinds,
since it never hits the disk. And grep -i uncatalog doc/src/sgml
comes up empty. Where else should I be looking?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2012-06-13 17:22:36 Is cachedFetchXidStatus provably valid?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-13 17:14:10 Re: [RFC][PATCH] Logical Replication/BDR prototype and architecture