| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
| Date: | 2014-08-14 19:25:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob4A5BWrOiszNFNEjp=Qku8Pg+tNvwZNLqS7g1Sq06BGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 1.
> + Number of parallel connections to perform the operation. This
> option will enable the vacuum
> + operation to run on parallel connections, at a time one table will
> be operated on one connection.
>
> a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
> instead of parallel connections?
I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word. Maybe "simultaneous"?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-14 19:27:32 | Re: Immediate standby promotion |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2014-08-14 19:24:34 | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |