Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
Date: 2011-10-03 15:16:06
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob1g9EimLSXjPoZjgGPHARXSntWFdwR=xaMbQLio=YOoA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I think that new versions of patch can handle unified diffs without a
>> problem, but older versions choke on them.  My Mac has 2.5.8 and
>> handles unidiffs no problem.
>
> Even containing git headers?

Yeah, it just skips right over them. I've never had even a minor
problem on that account, which is why I was surprised to see it giving
you so much trouble.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-03 15:16:31 Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes altogether?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-10-03 15:13:55 Re: Should we get rid of custom_variable_classes altogether?