Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Date: 2011-09-23 13:34:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmoawhOBcphVHMFMC1zc4UNULge8S=dsFMCzgP3Z6iRzCqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review!

Koyotaro Horiguchi -

Are you going to re-review the latest version of this patch?

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-09-23 13:39:46 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6189: libpq: sslmode=require verifies server certificate if root.crt is present
Previous Message Yeb Havinga 2011-09-23 13:30:55 Re: Satisfy extension dependency by one of multiple extensions