Re: "stuck spinlock"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "stuck spinlock"
Date: 2013-12-26 23:18:23
Message-ID: CA+TgmoatC7fPzy5WN1QBG2m6WddqSC76hdiQYfyqTgZKh1WoKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 12/12/13, 8:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Memo to hackers: I think the SIGSTOP stuff is rather obsolete now that
>> most systems dump core files with process IDs embedded in the names.
>
> Which systems are those?

MacOS X dumps core files into /cores/core.$PID, and at least some
Linux systems seem to dump them into ./core.$PID

I don't know how universal this is. I think a bigger objection to the
SIGSTOP stuff is that a lot of bugs are too real time to ever be
meaningfully caught that way.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-12-26 23:25:41 Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Previous Message Joseph Kregloh 2013-12-26 21:06:59 Re: pg_upgrade & tablespaces