Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-19 00:11:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaqDb8KF6jCemZ4Mam33=aB_ejHbbhSu4ssNqHjgrfCwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> No.  pg_settings already has a couple dozen "developer" parameters which nobody not on this mailing list understands.  Adding the recovery parameters to it wouldn't confuse anyone further, and would have the advantage of making the recovery parameters available by monitoring query on a hot standby.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-09-19 03:59:30 Re: Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2011-09-18 23:28:14 Re: [REVIEW] Generate column names for subquery expressions