Re: pgbench throttling latency limit

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Rukh Meski <rukh(dot)meski(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench throttling latency limit
Date: 2014-09-12 19:28:15
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoai-Mk0aooXtq2cCCTkpY_b7exo_AWTGH54eteJdLaN8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If there's a good case that the whole format needs to be changed anyway,
> like adding a new field, then we might as well switch to fractional epoch
> timestamps too now though. When I added timestamps to the latency log in
> 8.3, parsers that handled milliseconds were even more rare. Today it's
> still inconsistent, but the workarounds are good enough to me now. There's
> a lot more people using things like Python instead of bash pipelines here in
> 2014 too.

+1. s/\..*// is not an onerous requirement.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-09-12 19:38:01 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-09-12 19:17:03 Re: pgcrypto: PGP signatures