Re: Fixed redundant i18n strings in json

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixed redundant i18n strings in json
Date: 2014-07-31 12:57:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmoagE5g4r=BrGvKyMw9OEz5uFoJztQt0ZeXiMF9YVwHXgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Daniele Varrazzo
<daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Please find attached a small tweak to a couple of strings found while
> updating translations. The %d version is already used elsewhere in the
> same file.

Probably not a bad idea, but aren't these strings pretty awful anyway?
At a minimum, "arg" as an abbreviation for "argument" doesn't seem
good.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-07-31 13:09:34 Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-07-31 12:54:03 Re: gaussian distribution pgbench -- splits v4