| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Neha Sharma <neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
| Date: | 2017-05-10 03:26:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaeR9vbfSNU7SLGf4_1PTr6g7YvudGJPNSM5aB8OxPTxQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> We can't possibly support transition tables on TRUNCATE (the whole
> point of TRUNCATE is not to inspect all the rows so we can't collect
> them), and we already reject ROW triggers on TRUNCATE, so we should
> reject transition tables on STATEMENT triggers for TRUNCATE at
> creation time too. See attached. Thoughts?
Committed, with the addition of a regression test, the inclusion of
which in future bug fixes of this sort I recommend.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-10 03:35:42 | Re: Transition tables for triggers on foreign tables and views |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-05-10 03:24:23 | Re: Transition tables for triggers on foreign tables and views |