Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Date: 2014-07-31 18:41:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoacJu6ZPkWZBMz_0VTO2f8iQ8A5MaaAeNYh0zOO=jOHsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't have a problem with changing the name. But the name that you
>> propose is all about text. This patch is intended to add an extensible
>> infrastructure (a new part of sort support), plus one client of that
>> more complete extensible infrastructure (sort support for text). I
>> think there's a good chance that it could work well for another type
>> too, like numeric, if we could come up with a good system for encoding
>> numeric normalized keys, and if we can similarly get over the fact
>> that there is going to be a minority of cases that won't be helped at
>> all. That's a whole other discussion, though, and text is clearly the
>> really compelling case.
>>
>> Do you have another suggestion?
>
> How about "proxy sort keys"? It's suggestive of a format that can be
> relied on to faithfully represent the original key. But, like any
> proxy, it's a substitute, and by definition a substitute is never as
> authoritative as the original value. As such, the original value may
> need to be consulted when the proxy sort key doesn't have enough
> information to give a conclusive answer, which hopefully doesn't
> happen often. Like any good proxy, proxy sort keys know enough to know
> when they cannot faithfully represent what the original value would
> say. In practice proxy sort keys are almost always themselves
> pass-by-value, while serving to proxy a pass by reference type, but
> this isn't a formal requirement. Encoding strategies don't necessarily
> have anything to do with strxfrm(). That's just how text's default
> opclass happens to do it.

I certainly like that better than poor-man; but proxy, to me, fails to
convey inexactness. Perhaps we can work that idea in somehow. Or
maybe "pre"-something, to indicate that we do this before comparing
the regular key, in the hopes of not needing to.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-07-31 18:47:47 Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-07-31 16:58:00 Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL