From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ctrl+C from sh can shut down daemonized PostgreSQL cluster |
Date: | 2014-04-16 16:42:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaaJcotUNCNVrsOvdcUY3FSKPsm6TegPuCOtD62hBEzuw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Alternatively, we could do what the comments in pg_ctl have long thought
>>> desirable, namely get rid of use of system() in favor of fork()/exec().
>>> With that, pg_ctl could do a setsid() inside the child process.
>
>> I like this last approach.
>
> Me too, but it looked like a less-than-trivial bit of work to me
> (else I might just have gone and done it). Are you volunteering?
I don't have time right at the moment, but maybe at some point, if
nobody else gets to it first.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-04-16 16:51:41 | Tracking replication slot "blockings" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-16 16:35:29 | Re: Ctrl+C from sh can shut down daemonized PostgreSQL cluster |