Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
Date: 2013-11-21 02:05:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaYjnxNgy0OcOFh8OL1uGRROe764SBqBJGDEb8wA4fNkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The main goal of this patch is enable to an user the capability to store
> options
> (relations and attributes) related to extensions by using a fixed prefix
> called 'ext' in
> the defined name. It's cant be useful for replication solutions.
>
> So, with this patch we can do that:
>
> ALTER TABLE foo
> SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true);
>
> When 'ext' is the fixed prefix, 'somext' is the extension name,
> 'do_replicate' is the
> extension option and 'true' is the value.

This doesn't seem like a particular good choice of syntax; and I also
have my doubts about the usefulness of the feature.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2013-11-21 02:11:55 Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-11-21 02:03:12 Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs