Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks
Date: 2011-11-08 02:54:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaY_j2TFjPS3fe5iwCCy617uJELZd2mkcYSij4PQ5b+6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Doing that actually makes the patch simpler, so I went ahead and did
> that in the attached version, along with the renaming mentioned above.

Hearing no objections, I went ahead and committed this version.

Thanks for coding this up; I think this is a very useful improvement.

It would still be nice to fix the case where we need to freeze a tuple
that is on a page someone else has pinned, but I don't have any good
ideas for how to do that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-11-08 02:55:16 Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-08 02:35:23 Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits