Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier escribió:
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> > Sorry the patch which I attached has wrong indent on pg_controldata.
>> > I have modified it and attached the new version patch.
>> Now that you send this patch, I am just recalling some recent email
>> from Tom arguing about avoiding to mix lower and upper-case characters
>> for a GUC parameter name:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30569.1384917859@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>
>> To fullfill this requirement, could you replace walLogHints by
>> wal_log_hints in your patch? Thoughts from others?
>
> The issue is with the user-visible variables, not with internal
> variables implementing them. I think the patch is sane. (Other than
> the fact that it was posted as a patch-on-patch instead of
> patch-on-master).

But spelling it the same way everywhere really improves greppability.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company