| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
| Date: | 2014-02-25 16:46:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaVWY8r5Z-OnAXyZxZLj5We98Zt1yts1fduT6UiNQXW4Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:14:33AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 09:26:47PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > > So, would anyone like me to create patches for any of these items before
>> > > we hit 9.4 beta? We have added autovacuum_work_mem, and increasing
>> > > work_mem and maintenance_work_mem by 4x is a simple operation. Not sure
>> > > about the others. Or do we just keep this all for 9.5?
>> >
>> > I don't think anyone objected to increasing the defaults for work_mem
>> > and maintenance_work_mem by 4x, and a number of people were in favor,
>> > so I think we should go ahead and do that. If you'd like to do the
>> > honors, by all means!
>>
>> OK, patch attached.
>
> Patch applied.
Thanks!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-25 16:49:37 | Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT .. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-25 16:41:39 | Re: walsender doesn't send keepalives when writes are pending |