From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
Date: | 2013-01-27 04:37:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaUzys7LA8vSW21dekoujtC9Sf-+AV0+eW9pCg+bsJQwQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 01/27/2013 01:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> More people seem to have voted for the single file approach but I still
>>>> haven't understood why...
>>> Me neither. Having an include directory seems good, but I can't think
>>> why we'd want to clutter it up with a bajillion automatically
>>> generated files. One .auto file that gets overwritten at need seems
>>> way nicer.
>> IMO an include directory containing just one file is silly. If we're
>> going with the single-file approach, let's lose the directory altogether
>> and just store the file at $PGDATA/postgresql.conf.auto.
> Wasn't part of the reason for having the config dir to make package
> managers' lives easier and make it easier to script updates to
> postgresql.conf? For the use of things like pg_wrapper?
>
> I think the config dir has value even if a single .auto file is used, so
> that packages can drop their own config snippets into it. For example,
> if I installed a packaged extension that had its own postgresql.conf
> changes or new GUCs, I'd want it to be able to drop that into the
> configdir, not have to script changes to my postgresql.conf.
That was my understanding. But I just work here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-27 04:41:15 | Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-27 04:30:49 | Re: SYSV shared memory vs mmap performance |