Re: Mention in bgworker docs that db connection needs shmem access

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mention in bgworker docs that db connection needs shmem access
Date: 2013-07-04 15:13:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaT3pFK0OzV8=YGq-zE59QCPP6S5m80s6nvCDF5vYzoMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The bgworker documentation does not explicitely mention that a
> bgworker using BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION needs to have
> BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS set as well.
>
> Just to mention, a bgworker using only db connection flag and not
> shmem flag will fail at atart-up with this error.
> background worker "hello signal worker": must attach to shared memory
> in order to request a database connection
>
> Please find attached a patch that improves documentation a bit by
> mentioning this restriction. This should normally be backpatched to
> 9.3 stable.

Done. Thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-07-04 15:21:05 Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2013-07-04 14:55:50 Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)