From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, premanand <kottiprem(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB |
Date: | 2012-11-21 14:42:21 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaS6Z-=Mq-vw+kcsY512z8QOhi8_GXbfSFtF2EcwVyMvw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:57 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But, with the attached patch:
>>
>> rhaas=# create function xyz(smallint) returns smallint as $$select
>> $1$$ language sql;
>> CREATE FUNCTION
>> rhaas=# select xyz(5);
>> xyz
>> -----
>> 5
>> (1 row)
>>
>> rhaas=# create table abc (a int);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> rhaas=# select lpad(a, 5, '0') from abc;
>> lpad
>> ------
>> (0 rows)
>
> I continue to be of the opinion that allowing this second case to work
> is not desirable.
1. Why?
2. What's your counter-proposal?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-11-21 14:46:11 | Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2012-11-21 14:30:54 | Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review] |