Re: kqueue

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: kqueue
Date: 2016-04-21 18:15:53
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaM0g7SdXQ-0_Ecx4c+kf_f0eoUczpKLyX3SnYH-LQCiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On the WaitEventSet thread I posted a small patch to add kqueue
> support[1]. Since then I peeked at how some other software[2]
> interacts with kqueue and discovered that there are platforms
> including NetBSD where kevent.udata is an intptr_t instead of a void
> *. Here's a version which should compile there. Would any NetBSD
> user be interested in testing this? (An alternative would be to make
> configure to test for this with some kind of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE
> incantation but the steamroller cast is simpler.)

Did you code this up blind or do you have a NetBSD machine yourself?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

  • kqueue at 2016-03-29 23:53:59 from Thomas Munro

Responses

  • Re: kqueue at 2016-04-21 18:22:53 from Andres Freund

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-04-21 18:20:38 Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-21 18:11:39 Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions