Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior
Date: 2013-09-20 13:47:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaKxg=6if=e1e-XK4L0PmWoQx1iDq_OYnpiLCb==chE_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Handling for OID is not clear, shall we allow it or not in check constraint?
> In my current patch OID will not be allowed in check constraint.

I vote for allowing it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-09-20 13:48:09 Re: record identical operator - Review
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-09-20 13:43:52 Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior