Re: Triconsistent catalog declaration

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triconsistent catalog declaration
Date: 2014-09-15 17:56:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaKeKPFZw5ZX6KP2_itamsYApFV0FkxQJm9vFmmdreXCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> That makes for a bit awkward input and output from psql, when the values
> used are 0, 1, 2, rather than ascii characters. But that's OK, because as
> you said these functions are not callable from psql anyway, as they have
> "internal" arguments.

Maybe we should change them to something a bit more understandable.

> This requires a catalog change to fix. Are we still planning to do a
> catversion bump for 9.4 because of the jsonb changes?

That was my understanding, although we seem to be proceeding at an
inexplicably glacial pace.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-09-15 18:12:15 Re: jsonb contains behaviour weirdness
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-09-15 17:55:56 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)