Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
Date: 2011-10-21 13:02:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaHR4VJHsJ7NSs-awUW=N-xtqB8Ac34D6k+8YieP-fQGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> It seems to me v9.0 implementation is correct. It might be enbugged
> when OpFamilyCacheLookup() get missing_ok argument. :-(

Yep, looks that way. Will fix.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2011-10-21 14:36:03 Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2011-10-21 11:24:52 psql \set vs \copy - bug or expected behaviour?