Re: COMMENT on function's arguments

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COMMENT on function's arguments
Date: 2012-06-14 19:14:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaCYKaBx6Y76amxLxEvWKV0_jwkuoehs_=L+ow5z9Jvhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru> wrote:
> Does it make sense to have a comment on function's arguments? Of course it
> is possible to include these comments in a function's comment, but may be
> better to have them in more formalized way like comments on columns of a
> table. IDEs may use this information when providing hints for a function
> like in other languages.

This would be somewhat tricky, because our COMMENT support assumes
that the object upon which we're commenting has an ObjectAddress, and
individual arguments to a function don't, although perhaps the
sub-object-id stuff that we currently use to handle comments on table
columns could be extended to handle this case. I guess I wouldn't
object to a well-done patch that made this work, but creating such a
patch seems likely to be tricky, owing to the fact that there's
nothing in the system that thinks of the individual arguments to a
function as separate objects at present.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-14 19:20:49 Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2012-06-14 19:10:21 Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()