Re: Letting plpgsql in on the fun with the new expression eval stuff

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Letting plpgsql in on the fun with the new expression eval stuff
Date: 2017-12-21 03:58:26
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa6eGSAqSrOsGBMh-wAQ9_KtEcXkA6Me3SBAaN6_9-JHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Anyway, I left it as-is, but I'm willing to make the change if
> people feel the other way is better.

I feel the other way -- let's not add more pointer indirections if it
isn't really necessary.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-21 04:32:35 Re: Add hint about replication slots when nearing wraparound
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-12-21 03:40:55 Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0