Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers
Date: 2014-09-16 12:25:46
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa3_QDwYwTCZac0kAqB7Q7=OcsnixVZbMb=kg9T4DOukg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> At least a set of hooks has the merit to say: do what you like with
> your synchronous node policy.

Sure. I dunno if people will find that terribly user-friendly, so we
might not want that to be the ONLY thing we offer.

But even if it is, it is certainly better than a poke in the eye with
a sharp stick.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-09-16 12:29:52 Re: Triggers with DO functionality
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-09-16 12:20:41 Re: CRC algorithm (was Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes)