Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow background workers to be started dynamically.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow background workers to be started dynamically.
Date: 2013-07-22 19:50:38
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa1eaKk66x+OJwr8SMBbdnS0hiXoJ3=g_8PA5704A_t5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we have consensus to back-patch the other API changes as well.
> I'll work up a patch for that.

Pushed that as well.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-07-22 20:22:13 pgsql: pgrowlocks: Use GetActiveSnapshot() rather than SnapshotNow.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-07-22 19:44:29 pgsql: Back-patch bgworker API changes to 9.3.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karol Trzcionka 2013-07-22 19:52:14 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-07-22 19:40:36 Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables