| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Date: | 2013-04-22 19:15:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa15iKaBrr5mF1DRArsDcso7x8+3Az3nd4OODJF5qghBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> The biggest problem now is getting one of these faster algorithms (FNV
> or even a faster CRC) into shape that is acceptable to
> reviewers/committers. If we don't do that, we will be missing out on a
> lot of potential checksum users for whom the existing CRC algorithm is
> just too slow.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-04-22 19:19:36 | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-04-22 19:14:04 | Re: Enabling Checksums |