| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
| Date: | 2016-02-02 15:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa11pNLttW5bwRxCV3qOiB0sAAZbc1kn27vS6vViCRTAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Overall, I think this is on the right track, but it still needs some
>> work to make it cleaner.
>
> We've committed a large number of patches in this item this cycle. I
> think it's fair to mark it as Committed. Can somebody submit a new one
> to the next commitfest?
I plan to keep working with the patch authors on this patch during the
inter-CF period, but have no objection to it being considered as
Committed for CF purposes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | curtis.ruck | 2016-02-02 15:31:46 | Re: PostgreSQL Auditing |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-02-02 15:24:23 | Re: PostgreSQL Auditing |