Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date: 2014-10-02 14:40:30
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa0HDHkJ6t5rXshHuPDoEiaWj5=_3Jk7awB4oDX2EBpuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> OK.
>
> Given that the results look good, do you plan to push this?

By "this", you mean the increase in the number of buffer mapping
partitions to 128, and a corresponding increase in MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS?

If so, and if you don't have any reservations, yeah I'll go change it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-10-02 14:44:20 Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-10-02 14:36:23 Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction