| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Access method extendability |
| Date: | 2014-10-29 14:45:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-BNPXy4uiZ9kOYfWz48Wt=CGroUTyS9rW2xHh=Xc0zQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> To me this is a pretty independent issue.
I quite agree. As Stephen was at pains to remind me last night on
another thread, we cannot force people to write the patches we think
they should write. They get to pursue what they think the priorities
are, not what anyone else thinks they are. Of course we can and
should block patches that we think are a bad idea, or that are
badly-designed or badly-implemented for what they are, but we cannot
and should not block someone who feels that the first priority is A
just because we think it is B or C.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-10-29 14:47:58 | Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-29 14:41:24 | Re: Failback to old master |