Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
Date: 2011-09-23 22:02:31
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa==mGWqH2khyGxqL9UYOfx3zMaFB55=KSO7f2TroZ9kg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> s/visca-versa/vice-versa/
>> s/laods/loads/
>
> Fixed.  v4 attached.

Since it seems like people are fairly happy with this now, I've gone
ahead and committed this version. I suspect there are bugs, but I
don't think we're going to get much further until we actually try to
use this for something.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-09-23 22:25:01 Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2011-09-23 21:55:36 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf