From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
Date: | 2011-08-19 15:47:33 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZwFEkFZg3zH39=8e1f2QhKQTzUK8KfFHWcwv5DOTWTFw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)EMEA(dot)NEC(dot)COM> writes:
>>> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>>> Well, they should get at least a warning from referencing undefined
>>> functions, no?
>
>> Yes. User should notice warning messages due to undefined symbols.
>> I'm not certain whether it makes sense to add -Werror here, or not.
>
> Hmm. That would help catch the problem, but I'm a bit uncomfortable
> with adding -Werror in relatively new code. On the other hand, it's
> not like we expect sepgsql to work on a wide variety of systems, so
> maybe it'd be OK.
>
> On the whole I don't think it's worth messing with the cflags for this.
Yeah, I agree.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-19 15:57:44 | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-19 15:46:07 | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |