Re: possible dsm bug in dsm_attach()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possible dsm bug in dsm_attach()
Date: 2015-04-02 14:44:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZs32jfy6rcvx3f8+d9ZJxBusf7iZ0PGnt3JLvmm5D6PA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am facing an issue in case we need to create many segments for
> large inheritance hierarchy. Attached patch fixes the problem for me.

Sigh. You'd think I'd be able to write a 30-line patch without
introducing not one but two stupid bugs. But if you did think that,
you'd be wrong.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-04-02 14:46:10 Re: Why SyncRepWakeQueue is not static?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-04-02 14:42:58 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits.