Re: Pg default's verbosity?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Date: 2012-06-19 15:51:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZkSg7H20r75S2NwUA=1P-k94nMcM2KtL=79WSesEEvtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
>> we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though.  IME, the following two
>> messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
>
>> NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
>> serial column "foo.a"
>> NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
>> "foo_pkey" for table "foo"
>
> Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
> both of those two specific messages.  I seem to recall that Bruce has
> lobbied for them heavily in the past, though.

My vote would be to make 'em DEBUG1, and similarly with the UNIQUE
message that Fabian mentions downthread.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-19 15:57:12 Re: WAL format changes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-19 15:46:40 Re: WAL format changes