Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Date: 2011-09-14 12:12:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZfW9CZF_VQKxhcP4pGA0+ezAxmY3OufH82sY4iVATx2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2011/9/6 Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> GiST use serial numbers of operations for concurrency. In current
>> implementation xlog record ids are used in capacity of that numbers. In
>> unlogged table no xlog records are produced. So, we haven't serial numbers
>> of operations. AFAIK, it's enough to provide some other source of serial
>> number in order to make GiST work with unlogged tables.
>
> GiST is IMHO quite broadly used. I use it for example for indexing
> geometry and hstore types and there's no other choice there.
> Do you know whether unlogged option in create table will support GiST
> in the next release?

It's probably not a difficult patch to write, but I don't have any
current plans to work on it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2011-09-14 12:12:33 Re: What Would You Like To Do?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2011-09-14 12:11:05 Initialization of ResultTupleSlot in AppendNode