| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress) |
| Date: | 2014-05-23 20:18:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZex=VZjAe2PRe_2w=VPAcuQy9DWH4eSLhDuagSDGNSbA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> PostgreSQL already chose to follow the Oracle syntax when we
> implemented NOWAIT. So my proposal is that we follow the Oracle syntax
> again and use the words SKIP LOCKED.
>
> I don't see any advantage in inventing new syntax that leaves us
> incompatible with Oracle, nor do I see any need to be compatible with
> both Oracle and DB2 since the latter is much less likely to gain us
> anything in practice.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2014-05-23 21:09:26 | Re: Allowing join removals for more join types |
| Previous Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2014-05-23 20:08:06 | IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement |