Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, furuyao(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Date: 2014-10-03 18:02:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZbyzee5JpjxTdTeDps52JRTpMdg+OFKHg5u-KprJwvOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I do wonder whether --create/--drop aren't somewhat wierd for
> pg_receivexlog. It's not that clear what it means. It'd be ugly, but we
> could rename them --create-slot/drop-slot.

+1 on doing it, -1 on it being ugly.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-10-03 18:06:33 Re: replicating DROP commands across servers
Previous Message Arthur Silva 2014-10-03 18:00:56 Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4