Re: RLS feature has been committed

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: RLS feature has been committed
Date: 2014-09-23 15:19:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ_RM7QLE-VYE1pMgf4Nq75EffcJyVdf4FY+8ju=2Wgtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Regardless of what Robert may feel, review should only generally be
> *expected* during a commitfest, but it can be done at any time.
> Committers are free to commit at any time. The process was never
> intended to restrict what committers do or when - in fact when I
> introduced the process to -hackers, it was specifically worded to say
> that developers are strongly encouraged to take part in the commitfest
> reviews, but not forced to, and may continue to work on their patches
> as they see fit.

So, just to be clear, you're saying that committers are free to commit
things even when other community members (who may themselves be
committers) ask them not to?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2014-09-23 15:23:22 Re: RLS feature has been committed
Previous Message Dave Page 2014-09-23 15:16:18 Re: RLS feature has been committed