Re: Set new system identifier using pg_resetxlog

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Set new system identifier using pg_resetxlog
Date: 2014-07-01 15:11:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZXih6aiyefqAMzQ5wXkVWEQKzO+8+TFeHn3toi5z5Z4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think it's pretty much a given that pg_resetxlog is a tool that can
> have disastrous effects if used lightly. If people changes their sysid
> wrongly, they're not any worse than if they change their multixact
> counters and start getting failures because the old values stored in
> data cannot be resolved anymore ("it's already been wrapped around").
> Or if they remove all the XLOG they have since the latest crash. From
> that POV, I don't think the objection that "but this can be used to
> corrupt data!" has any value.

After thinking about this a little more, I guess I don't really think
it's a bit problem either - so consider my objection withdrawn.

I am, however, kind of frustrated, still, that the pg_computemaxlsn
patch, which I thought was rather a good idea, was scuttled by the
essentially that same objection: let's not extend pg_resetxlog &
friends because people might use the new functionality to do bad
things and then blame us.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-07-01 15:19:02 Re: Set new system identifier using pg_resetxlog
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-07-01 14:46:41 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)