Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context
Date: 2015-04-23 13:47:13
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZX3QaxRtaMNd-DB=GTC_nn8oZDgeKkjcSQ4PhAuDQmAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't see a contradiction. There is clean agreement, so ERROR level should
> to show the context. NOTICE and WARNINGs doesn't need it - and there is a
> backward compatibility and usability reasons don't do it.

Whether notices and warnings need it is a matter of opinion. I don't
think your idea is bad, and it might be a good rule of thumb in many
cases, but I slightly prefer Marko's approach of adding a new option.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-04-23 13:50:24 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-04-23 13:45:38 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.