Re: logical changeset generation v6.7

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6.7
Date: 2013-12-03 20:13:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZV8_=0LO716sNKwPp+dLzbsFXYO=1p1m4NOo8RRemcDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-11-28 21:15:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> OK, I've committed the patch to adjust the definition of
>> IsSystemRelation()/IsSystemClass() and add
>> IsCatalogRelation()/IsCatalogClass().
>
> Thanks for taking care of this!
>
>> I kibitzed your decision about
>> which function to use in a few places - specifically, I made all of
>> the places that cared about allow_system_table_mods uses the IsSystem
>> functions, and all the places that cared about invalidation messages
>> use the IsCatalog functions. I don't think any of these changes are
>> more cosmetic, but I think it may reduce the chance of errors or
>> inconsistencies in the face of future changes.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Do you think we need to do anything about the
> ERROR: cannot remove dependency on schema pg_catalog because it is a system object
> thingy? Imo the current state is much more consistent than the earlier
> one, but that's still a quite surprising leftover...

I don't feel obliged to change it, but I also don't see a reason not
to clean it up.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2013-12-03 20:15:08 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-12-03 19:41:08 Re: Extension Templates S03E11