Re: On partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Date: 2014-12-05 16:43:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZTzAk136aLg=qAFhUFhPk4TC=T3oGV21R2Jpn7HHVApA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I think you are right. I think in this case we need something similar
>> to column pg_index.indexprs which is of type pg_node_tree(which
>> seems to be already suggested by Robert). So may be we can proceed
>> with this type and see if any one else has better idea.
>
> Yeah, with that, I was thinking we may be able to do something like dump a Node that describes the range partition bounds or list of allowed values (say, RangePartitionValues, ListPartitionValues).

That's exactly what the kind of thing I was thinking about.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-12-05 17:08:30 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-12-05 16:42:26 Re: On partitioning